If you are making a Udemy course, you’ll notice that you are limited by how much you can charge ($10-$200). Luckily, pricing on Udemy is dead simple: you always charge the maximum amount you can.
Why? Udemy sells 95% of its enrollments through heavy 90%+ discounting. Virtually no one ever buys your course at the full sticker price. This is a well known secret. What this means for you is that price has nothing to do with what the student ends up paying, so you should instead think of your price as a subconscious quality signal to the perusing student.
If everyone buys the course between $10-20, then pricing it low at $50 only tells the student that you don’t think the course is that valuable, and they would be better off spending their $10-20 on a course that claims to have $200 in value (4x the value for the same price).
Online courses can have the same information as consulting, but they’ll never have the same value. If you pre-record a lesson, you can’t tailor that lesson directly to the student that’s watching (because you have to make it for everyone) and you don’t give the student a chance to ask questions immediately as they have them.
Online courses do have some advantages vs. consulting, of course, such as the convenience of being able to watch whenever they have time and the ability to convey MORE information in less time by delivering tightly focused content in your videos. Regardless of this, an online course hour is just not the same value as 1 hour on the phone with you. You might be more efficient in the video, but the lack of customization and immediate feedback inevitably makes it less valuable (at least in the eyes of the student).
Pre-recorded video we value at 20% of the same amount of consulting, and live sessions are a little better at 30% (because you can ask questions).
If you’re the type that makes 10s of hours of content, then feel free to cap the hours you include in your calculator. The SixFigureInstructor.com Fast-Track Program includes a whopping 70 hours of pre-recorded video, which would inevitably force us to price it over $3,000, but we don’t want to charge that high of a price so we cap our hours in our calculation.
These numbers are generic averages meant to represent the typical value students see in their extras. If you feel like one of the extras you offer is more or less valuable, then adjust accordingly. If, for example, you do offer a custom action plan created for each student after enrollment and there is really a lot of work and customization that goes into it, feel free to adjust the value up. If you offer a community group but the current group is too small currently to be that useful, then adjust that value down.
In email marketing, a bandit test is when you send out multiple variations of an email or promotion to a small portion of your list, determine the best version based on sales/engagement, and then promote the winning combination to the rest of the list.
To get the most out of your test, you need to do two things:
1) email enough people in each group to know your test is statistically valid (or close to it)
2) maximize the reserve portion of your email list as best you can.
The game we’re playing here is that we need to message enough people to get a good poll of what they’ll pay, and at the same time leave a chunk of reserve emails in order to maximize the money we make from our launch when we eventually select our optimal price.
I would recommend at least 100, but more is always better.
If you’re new to online advertising, ROAS just means “how much money did you earn for every dollar you spent on advertising?”. If you spent $100 acquiring a $200 student, then your ROAS is 2x (or sometimes displayed as 200%).
Yes, they do, but they are limited by how long they can attribute a sale to a campaign. Facebook, for example, can only track your users post click for 7 days, so if your students purchase after 7 days they won’t be able to count them correctly. Since you divided your test into 3 different prices, it’s actually really easy to do attribution. You just count up the total receipts for each purchase price.
It is entirely possible that when you run these tests you end up in the red, because after all these campaigns are not optimized at all. If that is the case, you would still do the same thing. Go with the price point that had the best metrics, even if they were negative. A price point returning 0.9x ROAS is still better than one returning 0.6x ROAS. A student that lost you $30 to acquire is much better than a student that lost you $150. Use that best price as your baseline going forward, and focus on improving your ads, your offer, and your post-click funnel.
If you can only serve, say, 100 students per quarter, then it’s best to get the maximum amount of profit per student. If you just go by which campaign got you the most money, you might end up with a larger group of less profitable students. It’s very plausible that you run into a scenario like this:
One is more money, but much cheaper students that bring in less per person. If you have time intensive bonuses, then you might not think $60 per student is worth it. On the flipside, if you’re more focused on growing your student base so you can sell bigger, more varied programs to them in the future, then lower acquisition cost students might make MORE sense. In fact, a lot of course creators try to acquire students for near breakeven, so they can maximize how many paid students they have on their list in the shortest amount of time.
Subscribe now for free tools, strategies and resources